Clarevon Consulting Group was not built from a boardroom or a consulting playbook. It was built from 10+ years of operating inside enterprise outsourcing environments — managing the relationships, fixing the governance gaps, and developing the methodology that became the G.A.P. Method™.
Clarevon is a management consulting firm with one area of deep expertise: the governance of outsourced vendor relationships.
The firm was founded on one observation that kept repeating across every enterprise environment we worked in: most technology companies invest significant resources in selecting BPO vendors and almost nothing in governing them.
The results are predictable. Vendor relationships run on spreadsheets and informal check-ins. SLAs become outdated the moment the business evolves. Reporting is vendor-owned. Escalations multiply. And when something fails — in a client audit, a contract renewal, a leadership transition — nobody has the documentation to respond.
Clarevon exists to close that gap — for organizations in cybersecurity, IT managed services, and SaaS, where the governance gap between what a vendor promises and what they deliver is most consequential.
I founded Clarevon because I kept seeing the same problem everywhere I worked: organizations had invested heavily in choosing the right vendor and almost nothing in managing what came after the contract was signed. The governance layer — the thing that makes a vendor relationship actually perform — was consistently missing.
I spent over a decade building that layer from the inside. At CyberArk, I managed a $7M–$8M outsourcing program — governing vendor performance, redesigning the SLA framework, executing knowledge transfer for 104+ engineers, and recovering CSAT from 89% to 93% through governance redesign. At NCR Voyix, six years of leading technology implementation programs across restaurant and retail clients gave me the vendor coordination, escalation architecture, and accountability frameworks that became the foundation of the G.A.P. Method.
Clarevon is the firm I built to take that work to other organizations — so they don't have to find out what ungoverned vendor relationships cost the hard way.
I hold a PMP from the Project Management Institute, a CSM from Scrum Alliance, and a CSPO. I'm currently completing a B.S. in IT Management and MBA in IT Management at Western Governors University.
Clarevon engagements are delivered by credentialed senior program managers with direct experience in the verticals we serve — not by junior consultants managed from a distance.
Every Clarevon engagement is led by a senior PM with direct experience in BPO governance, outsourcing program management, or AI governance — and right-sized to the scope of the engagement. Organizations that engage Clarevon work with the same senior-level expertise from kickoff through handoff. There is no bait-and-switch to junior resources once the contract is signed.
Nothing is built in isolation. Every engagement includes continuous client input — because governance frameworks the client doesn't own don't get used.
Before designing any accountability structure, Clarevon asks the vendor what they need from the client to succeed. This is the question most organizations never ask — and the one that changes the shape of the framework.
An engagement ends when everyone is aligned, processes are documented, roles are clear, and the vendor relationship no longer depends on any single person — including Clarevon — to function.
Clarevon's consultants are active participants in the professional communities where our buyers operate — not just conference attendees, but contributors.
Schedule a 30-minute discovery conversation. Our team will assess your vendor governance situation and recommend the right engagement.
30 minutes · No obligation